CHRONOSCOPE · time, at every scale Home
◌ Workbench
← All concepts
Concept

✓ How sure? The tags

Science isn't one pile of facts. Each claim here says how far it has got — and one paper can hold claims at several levels.

The tags

Established
Independent tests agree and the alternatives have failed. Still open to revision at its limits — Newton's gravity was established, and still is, inside the limits relativity found.
Contested
Serious evidence or argument exists, but experts disagree about it.
Speculative
A published proposal without supporting evidence yet. It may still make testable predictions — that's what to look for.
Ruled out
Made clear predictions that failed. Kept, because how ideas die is the best lesson in method.
Analogy
A picture or story to help thinking — not a claim about how nature works.
Hypothesis
This project's own ideas, or visitors' — not mainstream physics. Shown in Workbench mode, to be tested, not believed.

Tag claims, not papers

A single paper can hold claims at different levels. Two Films is a good example: that the two films are exact solutions of a two-time wave equation is Established mathematics; that this tells us anything about our universe is Speculative.

Tiers and modes

Tags group into tiers: Mainstream (Established, Contested, Ruled out), Frontier (Speculative), Exploratory (Hypothesis) and Lens (Analogy). Learn mode shows Mainstream, Frontier and Lens; Lab mode adds Exploratory.

How a claim moves

Idea → worked-out proposal → tested and disputed → confirmed, or ruled out. How sure are we? walks one claim — the expanding universe — up that ladder.

See it in the labs

Sources: Project method (CLAUDE.md, D-004, D-008, D-016, D-025).

New here?