CHRONOSCOPE · time, at every scale Home
◌ Workbench

∑ The maths › Flatland · open the lab →

Flatland: the maths

Exact geometry: slices of spheres, cones and cubes by a lower-dimensional space, projections, and ray casting for A Square's view. The story is Abbott's 1884 analogy.

Equations

r = √(R² − z²)
The circle A Square sees when a sphere of radius R is at height z above his plane (nothing when |z| ≥ R).
corners = 2ⁿ, edges = n · 2ⁿ⁻¹
An n-dimensional cube: each step doubles the shape and joins every corner to its copy.
tilt < 45° → ellipsoid; = 45° → paraboloid; > 45° → hyperboloid
Slicing a 4D cone at a tilt: the 3D cousins of the ellipse, parabola and hyperbola.
tesseract ∩ {x + y + z + w = d}
A tesseract passing corner-first through our space: its slice starts as a tetrahedron and is an octahedron halfway.

Constants

dimensions2 (Flatland) to 5

Worked examples ✓ checked on every change

Sphere R = 3 at height 2.7: the slice's radius1.308√(R² − z²)
Tesseract (n = 4): corners and edges16 corners, 32 edges2⁴ and 4 · 2³
4D cone sliced at exactly 45°paraboloidthe conic at the cone's own slope
Tesseract corner-first, just past the corner: slice's corners4 (a tetrahedron)4 edges meet at a corner
…halfway through6 (an octahedron)the 6 corners with two +1s and two −1s

The app's test suite puts the lab in each setup, reads the lab's own result, and fails if it strays from these values.

What's simplified

  • Orthographic projection for the 3D views; the Flatland world is drawn from above for us, and as a single line for A Square.

Where it breaks

It doesn't — the geometry is exact. The analogy is the part to hold lightly: tagged ANALOGY.

Sources: E. A. Abbott, Flatland (1884); H. S. M. Coxeter, Regular Polytopes (1973).

New here?